Specialized automated translation · terminology and reference checks passedArabic original

The Qareen in the Qur’an: How Was the Concept Reduced in the Tradition, and How Did This Affect Consciousness?

The Qur’an from Within

Content languageOriginal: العربية
NarratorEnglish

The qareen is not merely a personal devil, but any influence that makes falsehood appear attractive: a person, a group, or a system.

Introduction

The Noble Qur’an presents the concept of the qareen as a companion who influences a human being, but does not restrict it to an ever-present devil, as it was later understood in the tradition. The qareen in the Qur’an has multiple dimensions: it may be a devil, a person, a group, or an influential system that makes falsehood appear attractive and affects human conduct and decisions.

Nevertheless, the tradition reduced this concept to a single personal devil who accompanies a person throughout life—a reduction that affected Muslims’ consciousness and made them less aware of the influence of their environment and society upon them.

The Concept of the Qareen in the Qur’an

The Devil as a Qareen

﴿وَمَن يَعْشُ عَن ذِكْرِ الرَّحْمَنِ نُقَيِّضْ لَهُ شَيْطَانًا فَهُوَ لَهُ قَرِينٌ﴾ (Whoever turns away from the remembrance of the Most Merciful, We assign to him a devil, who becomes his companion.) [الزخرف: ٣٦]

A person who neglects the remembrance of God is thus assigned a qareen, but this companion is not the sole cause of going astray: human choice always remains.

The Qareen Who Makes Falsehood Appear Attractive

﴿وَقَيَّضْنَا لَهُمْ قُرَنَاءَ فَزَيَّنُوا لَهُم مَّا بَيْنَ أَيْدِيهِمْ وَمَا خَلْفَهُمْ﴾ (We assigned companions to them, who made attractive to them what was before them and what was behind them.) [فصلت: ٢٥]

Here it becomes apparent that the qareen can be a network of multiple influences: people, groups, ideas, or social systems, rather than only beings of the unseen.

The Qareen on the Day of Resurrection

﴿قَالَ قَرِينُهُ رَبَّنَا مَا أَطْغَيْتُهُ وَلَكِن كَانَ فِي ضَلَالٍ بَعِيدٍ﴾ (His companion said, “Our Lord, I did not make him transgress, but he was far astray.”) [ق: ٢٧]

The qareen did not force the person to go astray; rather, the person chose to follow him. This clarifies the individual’s responsibility in the face of companions’ influence.

The Qareen as a Party to a Dialogue

﴿قَالَ قَائِلٌ مِّنْهُمْ إِنِّي كَانَ لِي قَرِينٌ﴾ (One of them said, “I once had a companion.”) [الصافات: ٥١]

The qareen may thus be a living person or a party exercising intellectual influence, rather than merely a being of the unseen.

The Tradition’s Obscuring of the Concept

With the spread of Qur’anic commentaries, most scholars associated the qareen exclusively with the personal devil, relying on reports such as “There is not one of you who has not had his companion from among the jinn assigned to him.” This appeared in the works of major exegetes such as al-Tabari, Ibn Kathir, and al-Qurtubi.

There are three reasons for this obscuring: reliance on transmitted reports and their literal association with the verses; the easy explanation through the unseen, linking phenomena to jinn and the devil rather than undertaking social and intellectual analysis; and the simplification of meanings for the public, because the idea of a “personal devil” is easier than that of a multidimensional network of influences.

A Comparison with Jewish Thought

In the Jewish tradition, Satan appears as one who tests the human being: in the Book of Job, he tests him, but is not his personal companion throughout life. There are also guardian angels who watch over and assist human beings, and sometimes evil spirits that tempt them, but these are associated with moral testing rather than daily control. Some texts refer to companions for the Day of Judgment in a symbolic sense more than as entities that tempt people throughout their lives.

The fundamental difference is that the Qur’an encompasses all forms of social, intellectual, and environmental influence, whereas Jewish thought focuses on the spiritual dimension and individual testing.

How Did These Conceptions Enter the Tradition?

Contact in the Arabian Peninsula: Jewish tribes in Medina and the vicinity of Mecca possessed texts and reports about devils, angels, and companions. Translation and early exegesis: some concepts were reformulated in early Qur’anic commentaries, particularly those concerning the devil and the qareen. The blending of the Qur’an and transmitted reports: as a result of this blending, the qareen was reduced to an ever-present devil, far removed from the broader Qur’anic meaning.

The Effect of This Obscuring on Consciousness

The focus on the personal devil led people to view misguidance solely as an unseen force, while the influence of society, the media, social media, and collective ideas as real companions disappeared from their awareness. This allowed—indirectly—external powers to control modern companions and direct public opinion.

The Qareen May Be a Bad Friend

The Qur’an makes clear that the qareen may be a devil who whispers, a person who exerts influence and makes falsehood appear attractive, such as a bad friend, or a group or environment that drives one astray. On the Day of Resurrection, a person may regret this companion:

﴿يَا لَيْتَ بَيْنِي وَبَيْنَكَ بُعْدَ الْمَشْرِقَيْنِ فَبِئْسَ الْقَرِينُ﴾ (Would that between me and you were the distance of the two easts! What an evil companion!) [الزخرف: ٣٨]

Conclusion

The Qur’an presents the qareen as a comprehensive, multidimensional concept: a devil, a person, a group, or a system. The early tradition reduced its meaning to an ever-present personal devil, obscuring Muslims’ awareness of the real companions in their lives.

A correct understanding of the qareen opens horizons for critical thinking, helps uncover the network of misguidance and the embellishment of falsehood in society, and restores individual and social responsibility to their proper place.